Memory Reframed – notable people which influence the jewish museum

pg 52 – The cultural figures and their methods through which Libeskind traces this “permanent human tension” include;

Heinrich von Kleist and “tragic Premonition”

Rahel Varnhagen and “sublimated assimilation”

Walter Benjamin and “inadequate ideology”

E.T.A Hoffman and “mad science”

Friedrich Schleiermacher and “displaced understanding”

Arnold Schoenberg and “inaudible music”

Paul Celan and “last words”.

Libeskind argues that it is the series of encounters between the visiors to the museum and the figures inscribed into the museum that will allow his space to emerge as a “concretized space of encounter”. This is how libeskind seeks to connect museum visitors to the lives and experiences of Germany’s jewish victims – through empathy with those individuals, both Jewish and non-jewish, who struggled for a higher order against the system. such a vision transforms a museum from a static container for exhibits into a living and dynamic space where visitors are not merely passive spectators but active participants.

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: